1 results
2 - The regulation of human parturition
-
- By Roger Smith, Sam Mesiano, Richard Nicholson, Vicki Clifton, Tamas Zakar, Eng-Cheng Chan, Andrew Bisits, Warwick Giles, Mothers and Babies Research Centre, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
- Edited by Michael L. Power, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington DC, Jay Schulkin, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington DC
-
- Book:
- Birth, Distress and Disease
- Published online:
- 16 October 2009
- Print publication:
- 28 July 2005, pp 74-87
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Preterm birth accounts for 70% of neonatal mortality and is a common cause for intellectual handicap among survivors. Approximately 50% of cases of cerebral palsy are associated with preterm birth, in turn preterm birth increases the risk of cerebral palsy by 40 times! (Goldenberg, 2002). Preterm labor thus afflicts individuals at the very beginning of their lives, depriving them of opportunities and increasing health and educational costs for families and society in general. Unfortunately the rates of preterm birth have not changed for over 30 years due to an inability to predict the event and lack of effective therapies.
This clinical problem has driven research into the mechanisms that regulate the timing of human birth and the disorders which cause preterm birth.
For reasons of ethics most research in the past has focused on animal work, especially in the sheep. Unfortunately studies have revealed substantial differences between parturition in humans and that in other animals. Thus animal studies provide us with clues as to how systems operate to regulate delivery in mammals but frustrate us with uncertainty as to whether particular mechanisms operate in the human. Experimental in vivo studies provide the strongest evidence for cause and effect, yet the closer we come to the human state in our near relatives the apes, the larger the ethical constraints on experimental studies become.